Ma. Ellingsen et al., RADIOVISIOGRAPHY VERSUS CONVENTIONAL RADIOGRAPHY FOR DETECTION OF SMALL INSTRUMENTS IN ENDODONTIC LENGTH DETERMINATION .1. IN-VITRO EVALUATION, Journal of endodontics, 21(6), 1995, pp. 326-331
Radiovisiography is a new intraoral radiographic imaging system, In th
is in vitro investigation, radiovisiography was compared with conventi
onal radiographs viewed with x2 magnification. Twenty-five extracted m
axillary molars were evaluated for clarity of size 8 and 10 endodontic
file tips in relation to the radiographic apex. Five images of radiov
isiography were compared with D-speed and E-speed radiographs: origina
l, enhanced, negative-to-positive, standard zoom, and zoom in the nega
tive-to-positive mode. D-speed radiographs were also compared with E-s
peed radiographs, Zoom in the negative-to-positive mode was statistica
lly equivalent to D-speed radiographs (p = 0.264) and superior to E-sp
eed radiographs (p < 0.001), The standard zoom was also superior to E-
speed radiographs (p = 0.025), D-speed radiographs were statistically
superior to E-speed radiographs; being judged better than E-speed 90%
of the time. Accurate identification of the position of the tips of si
ze 8 and 10 files was achieved on all D- and E-speed radiographs with
the use of magnification.