BREAST-CANCER IN WESTERN-AUSTRALIA IN 1989 .4. SUMMARY OF HISTOPATHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT IN 655 CASES

Citation
Jm. Harvey et al., BREAST-CANCER IN WESTERN-AUSTRALIA IN 1989 .4. SUMMARY OF HISTOPATHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT IN 655 CASES, Pathology, 27(1), 1995, pp. 12-17
Citations number
38
Categorie Soggetti
Pathology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00313025
Volume
27
Issue
1
Year of publication
1995
Pages
12 - 17
Database
ISI
SICI code
0031-3025(1995)27:1<12:BIWI1.>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
This study was part of a population-based survey of all cases of breas t cancer diagnosed in Western Australia in 1989. The paper concerns hi stopathology reporting by pathologists in 655 cases of carcinoma of th e breast in that year, before the introduction of mammographic screeni ng programmes. Pathological features of the neoplasms are documented, and the extent to which information known to be of clinical or prognos tic importance was included in the reports is analysed. 96.5% of all p athology reports included information on breast cancer subtype and, in 98.6% of cases with axillary dissection, the number of lymph nodes di ssected, and the number containing metastatic tumor was stated. In 83. 7% of cases of invasive carcinoma exact tumor dimensions were recorded . In 44.9% of cases histological grade was recorded, and information a bout excision margins was present in 60% of reports overall. The repor ting of pathological features in many instances was limited by the way in which the specimen was handled prior to reception. At the time of the study, views about the importance of many aspects of histological assessment were still evolving. Even now, for example, consensus is st ill being reached on the value of histological grading in predicting p rognosis and whether reliable histological assessment of such factors as extent of DCIS and completeness of excision of DCIS is possible. Th e introduction of mammographic screening since 1989 has provided a foc us for wider discussion about the Value of histological information in prognostication and patient management. A case is made to support the use of ''check lists'' for surgical pathology reports in cases of bre ast cancer.