B. Dahlof et al., EFFICACY AND TOLERABILITY OF LOSARTAN POTASSIUM AND ATENOLOL IN PATIENTS WITH MILD-TO-MODERATE ESSENTIAL-HYPERTENSION, American journal of hypertension, 8(6), 1995, pp. 578-583
The objective of this study was to compare the antihypertensive effica
cy and tolerability of losartan potassium (losartan) and atenolol in p
atients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. This was a multi
national, prospective, randomized, 12-week double-blind parallel study
with a follow-up of 4 to 10 days posttreatment to assess any adverse
effects of abrupt therapy withdrawal. Two hundred two patients were ra
ndomized (2: 1) to treatment with losartan or atenolol, 50 mg once dai
ly. Patients were titrated after 6 weeks to 100 mg once daily if their
blood pressure was uncontrolled (sitting diastolic blood pressure gre
ater than or equal to 90 mm Hg). Trough sitting diastolic blood pressu
re reductions at weeks 6 and 12 were similar in both the losartan (-9.
2 mm Hg and -8.3 mm Hg) and atenolol (-10.8 mm Hg and -10.1 mm Hg) gro
ups and a similar percentage of patients responded to each drug. Both
agents were generally well tolerated, although eight patients (two pat
ients taking losartan, and six taking atenolol) were withdrawn because
of clinical adverse events (P less than or equal to .05). Reduction i
n pulse rate from baseline averaged 10 beats/min in the atenolol group
with no pulse rate reduction observed in the losartan group (P < .01)
. No evidence of rebound hypertension was observed in either group. In
conclusion, losartan was as efficacious as atenolol in blood pressure
reduction, and was at least as well tolerated.