Mg. Myers et al., PREVALENCE OF WHITE COAT EFFECT IN TREATED HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS IN THE COMMUNITY, American journal of hypertension, 8(6), 1995, pp. 591-597
Patients receiving drug therapy for hypertension in the tertiary care
setting frequently exhibit higher office readings compared to ambulato
ry blood pressure values (white coat effect). In this study, the preva
lence of a white coat effect was determined in an unselected populatio
n of 147 hypertensive patients receiving treatment from their family p
hysicians in the community. The proportion of patients with a white co
at effect (defined as office - ambulatory blood pressure greater than
or equal to 20/10 mm Hg) was significantly (P < .001) higher when base
d upon the family physician's routine blood pressure readings (91/147)
, compared to special readings taken by the family physician for the s
tudy (54/147) or readings taken by a research nurse (30/147). There wa
s a higher correlation (P < .05) between the ambulatory systolic blood
pressure and the nurse's readings (r = 0.62) or special physician's r
eadings (r = 0.55) v the routine physician's readings (r = 0.34). Left
ventricular mass index as measured by echocardiography correlated (P
< .01) with the special physician (r = 0.27), nurse (r = 0.23), and am
bulatory systolic blood pressure readings (r = 0.24), but not with the
routine physician's readings (r = 0.06). A white coat effect is frequ
ently present in treated hypertensive patients when blood pressure is
recorded by family physicians in routine clinical practice.