This review of economists' theories about incomplete contracts (proper
ty rights, the costs of transactions or a ''reputation model'') shows
that the defenders of orthodox economic theory do not consider the not
ion of trust to be a pertinent analytical category. In objection to th
is, an approach is proposed that places trust at the center of contrac
tual relationships. Several empirical studies conducted by the author
in labor relations have shown that incomplete contracts serve less to
define binding commitments than to create a framework wherein the appl
ication of commitments can be (re)negotiated. This supposes that parti
es to the contract trust each other strongly enough to be ready to bec
ome involved in such a process.