Joint fieldwork has led the authors to question several accepted ideas
of ethnographic method and theory. According to traditional wisdom, t
he fieldworker is a solitary figure who, acting as participant and obs
erver, strives to overcome a gap of knowledge between her world and th
at of others; ethnographies are compilations, translations, and interp
retations of knowable facts. In contrast to this construction, the aut
hors' collaboration suggests that in fieldwork the anthropologist crea
tes a community of inquiry. This community includes voices from the fi
eld, from home, from the past, and from joint workers; the ethnographe
r participates in many-stranded conversations and contexts of learning
. Ethnographies are not objective reports or displays of new methodolo
gies but the products of artisans who draw on the skills and imaginati
ons of many. Like good conversations and culture itself, ethnographies
are never complete.