Rm. Rockney et al., THE PLAIN ABDOMINAL ROENTGENOGRAM IN THE MANAGEMENT OF ENCOPRESIS, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine, 149(6), 1995, pp. 623-627
Objective: To determine whether fecal retention in encopretic children
can be assessed objectively using the plain abdominal roentgenogram a
nd whether roentgenographic evidence of fecal retention is associated
with clinical findings on presentation in encopretic children. Design:
Retrospective case studies. Setting: Two pediatric incontinence clini
cs. Participants: Sixty children (72% male), aged 4 to 18 years (mean,
8 years), who met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorde
rs, Revised Third Edition criteria for the diagnosis of encopresis. Al
l had a plain abdominal roentgenogram obtained on presentation. Interv
entions: None. Results: Using a systematic assessment tool with good i
nterrater reliability (kappa=0.65), 78% (47) of the children had fecal
retention by roentgenographic criteria on presentation, while 22% (13
) did not. Retentive encopretic children were less likely to have a hi
story of difficult toilet training (P=.018) than nonretentive encopret
ic children. There was no association between fecal retention and seve
ral clinical factors, including historical features commonly attribute
d to fecal retention. Retentive encopretic children were no more likel
y to have a palpable abdominal mass than nonretentive encopretic child
ren, but they were more likely to have excessive stool on rectal exami
nation (P=.015). Using the plain abdominal roentgenogram as the gold s
tandard, the rectal examination showed a positive predictive value of
84.8% and a negative predictive value of 50% in assessing fecal retent
ion. Conclusions: Fecal retention in encopretic children can be assess
ed objectively from a plain abdominal roentgenogram. Most, but not all
, encopretic children present with fecal retention. A positive rectal
examination is strongly predictive of fecal retention, in which case a
roentgenogram is not necessary to make that diagnosis. A negative rec
tal examination may not rule out fecal retention, in which case an abd
ominal roentgenogram may be useful to make that diagnosis.