We consider a model where two agents, privately informed about their o
wn characteristics, play a (normal form) game on behalf of two uninfor
med principals. We analyze the existence of precommitment effects thro
ugh public announcements of contracts, in a model where agency contrac
ts, designed ex-ante, can always be secretly renegotiated, at the ex-a
nte and interim stages. We show that the existence of precommitment ef
fects depends both on the strategic complementarity of the agents' act
ions and on the direct effect of the opponents' actions on each princi
pal's welfare. In our model, the possibility of renegotiation is cruci
al for the existence of precommitment effects. The results are introdu
ced through an example of Cournot and Bertrand competition between fir
ms, viewed as vertical structures.