M. Kitano et al., SPATIALLY DISTRIBUTED RESPONSES INDUCED BY CONTRAST REVERSAL IN CAT VISUAL-CORTEX, Experimental Brain Research, 104(2), 1995, pp. 297-309
Field potentials were recorded from cat striate cortex, either between
an epidural screw electrode and a cannula-electrode inserted deep in
the gray matter (transcortical recording) or with a pair of metal micr
oelectrodes. Electrodes were placed bilaterally near the cortical proj
ection of the area centralis. The horizontal separation of the recordi
ng tips was similar to 2 mm and similar to 300 mu m, respectively. The
area of the visual field providing input to the recording site (recep
tive field) was determined by measuring the field potentials generated
by contrast reversal of high-contrast, achromatic bar gratings. Five-
degree-diameter grating patches were presented individually over a lar
ge area of the visual field. The gratings were contrast-reversed at 4,
6 or 10 Hz, while also being swept in spatial frequency between 0.56
and 5.24 c/deg. The receptive fields were similar to 20 deg across or
more, substantially larger than expected on the basis of cortical reti
notopy. Responses were also elicited by stimulation of the hemi-field
contralateral to that contributing to the classical receptive field, i
mplicating the presence of a callosal projection. The large, spatially
distributed receptive fields consisted of patches of high and low sen
sitivity. Continuous cortical infusion of either 100 mu M tetrodotoxin
or 10 mM muscimol at the recording site totally suppressed the transc
ortically recorded field potentials, proving that the local field pote
ntials were generated postsynaptically. The present findings suggest t
hat a cluster of cortical cells near the projection site of the area c
entralis receives input from remote cortical regions to an extent that
is comparable with that of anatomically demonstrated long-range later
al connections.