FALLOPIAN-TUBE SPERM PERFUSION HAS NO ADVANTAGE OVER INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION WHEN USED IN COMBINATION WITH OVARIAN STIMULATION FOR THE TREATMENT OF UNEXPLAINED INFERTILITY

Citation
O. Gregoriou et al., FALLOPIAN-TUBE SPERM PERFUSION HAS NO ADVANTAGE OVER INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION WHEN USED IN COMBINATION WITH OVARIAN STIMULATION FOR THE TREATMENT OF UNEXPLAINED INFERTILITY, Gynecologic and obstetric investigation, 39(4), 1995, pp. 226-228
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Obsetric & Gynecology
ISSN journal
03787346
Volume
39
Issue
4
Year of publication
1995
Pages
226 - 228
Database
ISI
SICI code
0378-7346(1995)39:4<226:FSPHNA>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
In this prospective randomized study we treated 60 couples with unexpl ained infertility with a combination of ovarian stimulation and either intrauterine insemination (IUI) or fallopian sperm perfusion (FSP). I n the IUI we used a volume of 0.5 mi of inseminate and in the FSP a vo lume of 4 mi. The demographic characteristics of the patients, the sti mulation parameters and the sperm data were not statistically differen t between the two groups. The pregnancy rate per cycle was 16.2% in th e IUI group and 14.5% in the FSP group and the pregnancy rate per woma n was 40 and 36.7%, respectively (not statistically different). We con clude that IUI and FSP are equally effective in the treatment of coupl es with unexplained infertility.