FALLOPIAN-TUBE SPERM PERFUSION HAS NO ADVANTAGE OVER INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION WHEN USED IN COMBINATION WITH OVARIAN STIMULATION FOR THE TREATMENT OF UNEXPLAINED INFERTILITY
O. Gregoriou et al., FALLOPIAN-TUBE SPERM PERFUSION HAS NO ADVANTAGE OVER INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION WHEN USED IN COMBINATION WITH OVARIAN STIMULATION FOR THE TREATMENT OF UNEXPLAINED INFERTILITY, Gynecologic and obstetric investigation, 39(4), 1995, pp. 226-228
In this prospective randomized study we treated 60 couples with unexpl
ained infertility with a combination of ovarian stimulation and either
intrauterine insemination (IUI) or fallopian sperm perfusion (FSP). I
n the IUI we used a volume of 0.5 mi of inseminate and in the FSP a vo
lume of 4 mi. The demographic characteristics of the patients, the sti
mulation parameters and the sperm data were not statistically differen
t between the two groups. The pregnancy rate per cycle was 16.2% in th
e IUI group and 14.5% in the FSP group and the pregnancy rate per woma
n was 40 and 36.7%, respectively (not statistically different). We con
clude that IUI and FSP are equally effective in the treatment of coupl
es with unexplained infertility.