Objective. Under the leadership of Chief Justices Taft and Hughes, Sup
reme Court justices were socialized in the ''no dissent unless necessa
ry'' tradition. As a result, few separate opinions were written betwee
n 1921 and 1940. Since 1941, however, there has been a decline of cons
ensual norms in the Supreme Court. This decline has been accompanied b
y diminished opportunities for socialization into the work of the Cour
t. The purpose of this research is to determine if these factors are s
ignificantly related to the behavior of freshman justices. Methods. Th
is research analyzes the proportion of separate opinions written by fr
eshman justices for the period 1921-92. Specifically, the proportions
of separate opinions written by freshman and senior justices are compa
red for the time periods of 1921-40 and 1941-92. Results. While no dif
ferences were found to exist between the proportion of separate opinio
ns written by freshman and senior justices of the earlier time period,
a systematic difference was found between freshman and senior separat
e opinion writing in the later time period. Conclusions. This finding
is consistent with the existence of the freshman effect. The most plau
sible and apparent reason for this disparity is the difficulty that fr
eshmen have adjusting to the Court's workload.