Db. Pearlstone et al., EFFECT OF ENTERAL AND PARENTERAL-NUTRITION ON AMINO-ACID LEVELS IN CANCER-PATIENTS, JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition, 19(3), 1995, pp. 204-208
Background: The syndrome of cancer cachexia can have a significant imp
act on response to therapy as well as on survival in cancer patients.
Therapies directed at metabolic perturbations in cachectic patients ar
e dependent on nutritional repletion and maintenance of adequate amino
acid substrate levels. This study compares the ability of oral feedin
g, enteral nutrition, and total parenteral nutrition to alter plasma a
mino acid levels in cancer patients. Methods: Patients with esophageal
cancer were stratified by weight loss. Patients with < 20% weight los
s were randomized to continue an ad libitum oral diet (group I) or to
receive total parenteral nutrition (group II) for 2 weeks; patients wi
th > 20% weight loss were randomized to receive either enteral nutriti
on (group III) or total parenteral nutrition (group IV) for 2 weeks. P
lasma amino acid levels were measured before the study and again after
2 weeks of nutrition support. Results: Before therapy, there was no d
ifference between the groups in total or essential amino acid levels;
however, patients in all groups had significantly lower total amino ac
id levels compared with those of normal controls. After 2 weeks of tre
atment, patients in groups I and III showed no difference in individua
l, essential, or total amino acid levels. However, patients in groups
II and IV showed significant increases in a number of individual amino
acids as well as in essential and total amino acid levels after 2 wee
ks of TPN. Conclusions: Patients with esophageal cancer demonstrated s
ignificant alterations in amino acid profiles compared with those of n
ormal controls. Total parenteral nutrition was superior to ad libitum
oral feeding and jejunostomy feeding in repleting plasma amino acid le
vels.