COMPARATIVE-EVALUATION OF THE QUANTITATIVE UTILIZATION OF PARENTERALLY AND ENTERALLY ADMINISTERED LEUCINE AND L-[1-13C,15N]LEUCINE WITHIN THE WHOLE-BODY AND THE SPLANCHNIC REGION
Ym. Yu et al., COMPARATIVE-EVALUATION OF THE QUANTITATIVE UTILIZATION OF PARENTERALLY AND ENTERALLY ADMINISTERED LEUCINE AND L-[1-13C,15N]LEUCINE WITHIN THE WHOLE-BODY AND THE SPLANCHNIC REGION, JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition, 19(3), 1995, pp. 209-215
Background: The purpose of this study was to quantify the kinetic aspe
cts of leucine metabolism in the whole body and within the splanchnic
region when an amino acid mixture is administered by the enteral route
as compared with administration by the parenteral route. Methods: Sev
en chronically catheterized dogs were studied during an intragastric i
nfusion of L-[1-C-13,-15-N]leucine with 0.24 g of complete amino acid
mixture (kg-1.h-1) for 6 hours. The results are compared with those pr
eviously reported for nine dogs studied under essentially identical ex
perimental conditions except that the tracer and amino acid mixtures w
ere given by vein. Results: At the whole body level, the various param
eters of leucine metabolism (flux, oxidation, and disappearance into a
nd release from proteins) were not significantly different among anima
ls that were infused enterally and those that were infused parenterall
y. Leucine metabolism within the splanchnic region and gut was more ex
tensive for enteral administration than for parenteral administration.
For the splanchnic region, 31.4%, 27.9%, and 6.0% of enterally admini
stered leucine was used for protein synthesis, deamination, and oxidiz
ation, respectively, compared with respective mean values of 19.5% (p
< .001), 13.4% (p < .001), and 4.1% (p < .05) for parenterally adminis
tered leucine. For liver, 4.8% of enterally administered leucine was o
xidized compared with 2.3% (p < .001) of parenterally administered leu
cine. These findings are qualitatively similar to those reported previ
ously by us when comparing enteral and parenteral amino acid intakes b
ut with an IV tracer infusion. Conclusion: Enteral administration seem
s to be more effective than an acute parenteral feeding regimen, at le
ast in maintaining leucine (protein) balance in gut tissues.