Mh. Delegge et al., PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROJEJUNOSTOMY - A DUAL CENTER SAFETY AND EFFICACY TRIAL, JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition, 19(3), 1995, pp. 239-243
Although jejunal tube placement through a percutaneous endoscopic gast
rostomy (PEG) has not been proven to be preferable to PEG feeding, it
would be theoretically advantageous for those patients prone to gastro
intestinal aspiration. However, reliable placement of a small bowel fe
eding tube through a PEG has been technically difficult. We have previ
ously reported successful placement of a percutaneous endoscopic gastr
ojejunostomy (PEG/J) with minimal complications. These results are in
contrast to other series that report technical difficulty, frequent tu
be dysfunction and gastric aspiration. We describe an over-the-wire PE
G/J technique performed by multiple operators at two medical centers.
Gastrostomy tube placement was successful in 94% of patients. Initial
placement of the jejunal tube was successful in 88% of patients. Secon
d attempts were 100% successful. The average procedure time was 36 min
utes. The distal duodenal and jejunal placement of the jejunal tube re
sulted in no episodes of gastroduodenal reflux. Complications included
jejunal tube migration (6%), clogging (18%), and unintentional remova
l (11%). The majority of patients were ultimately converted to either
oral or intragastric feedings. We conclude that the PEG/J system is a
reliable, reproducible method of small bowel feeding and is associated
with no episodes of tube feeding reflux when the jejunal tube is posi
tioned in the distal duodenum or beyond. Furthermore, it provides a te
mporary nutritional bridge for those patients who are later transition
ed to either PEG or oral feeding.