A COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR MEASURING THE NUTRITIVE-VALUE FOR PIGS OFA RANGE OF HULLED AND HULLESS BARLEY CULTIVARS

Citation
Rm. Beames et al., A COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR MEASURING THE NUTRITIVE-VALUE FOR PIGS OFA RANGE OF HULLED AND HULLESS BARLEY CULTIVARS, Animal feed science and technology, 62(2-4), 1996, pp. 189-201
Citations number
32
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture Dairy & AnumalScience
ISSN journal
03778401
Volume
62
Issue
2-4
Year of publication
1996
Pages
189 - 201
Database
ISI
SICI code
0377-8401(1996)62:2-4<189:ACOMFM>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
Six hulled and three hulless barley cultivars were each divided into a high and a low density fraction by the use of a gravity table. These fractions were analyzed for density (wt vol(-1)), 1000 kernel weight, soluble non-starch polysaccharides (S-NSP), insoluble NSP (I-NSP), lig nin, total dietary fibre (TDF, S-NSP plus I-NSP plus ligin), beta-gluc ans, gross energy and crude protein content. Measurements were made on pigs and rats for apparent energy digestibility (AED) and true protei n digestibility (TPD, apparent digestibility minus metabolic faecal N) , apparent dry matter digestibility in pigs by the mobile nylon bag (M NB) technique, and in vitro digestibility of dry matter and N by simul ation of enzymatic activity anterior to the terminal ileum and for the whole gastrointestinal tract. The results obtained were examined for the reliability of various measurements for predicting AED and TPD in pigs, Coefficients of determination were assessed for all sets of meas urements for both the total 18 samples and for the 12 hulled samples o nly. For most measurements, the predictive values were greater when 18 samples were used than when 12 samples were used, Best predictions fo r AED in pigs were AED in rats (r(2), 0.97, n = 18; 0.88, n = 12), I-N SP (r(2), 0.97, n = 18; 0.88, n = 12), in vitro organic matter digesti bility (r(2), 0.97, n = 18; 0.82, n = 12) and MNB dry matter digestibi lity (r(2), 0.86, n = 18; 0.85, n = 12). Coefficients of determination were not so high for the estimation of TPD in pigs, The only values s howing a strong relationship were obtained for the TPD measurements in rats (r(2), 0.94, n = 18; 0.88, n = 12).