Bladder augmentation is being performed with greater frequency for the
management of the high pressure, poorly compliant bladder. Presently,
incorporation of an enteric segment into the bladder is the most comm
on method of augmentation. However, the presence of a gastrointestinal
segment in the bladder has several well described complications.(1-5)
We previously reported using the massively dilated ureter of a nonfun
ctional kidney to augment the bladder.(6) Only urothelium contacts uri
ne and, thus, most of the complications of enteric augmentation are ob
viated. A comparative analysis of ureterocystoplasty versus ileocystop
lasty has shown that ureteral augmentation has equal efficacy in creat
ing a high volume, low pressure storage bladder.(7) We initially descr
ibed using a patch consisting of meter and renal pelvis in continuity.
(6) None of our patients had undergone any previous operations on the
ipsilateral kidney or meter. The blood supply of the ureteral/renal pe
lvic patch was carried by branches of the renal, gonadal and iliac ves
sels. We report 2 cases of ureterocystoplasty using megaureters that h
ad been previously operated on so that the distal ureteral blood suppl
y was disrupted. Postoperative urodynamics are excellent in both cases
. Successful ureterocystoplasty in these 2 patients who underwent prev
ious ureteral surgery demonstrates the importance of the proximal bloo
d supply for the ureteral/renal pelvic patch. Thus, previous distal ur
eteral surgery is not a contraindication to ureterocystoplasty if the
renal and gonadal vessels are preserved.