PERICARDITIS AND PERICARDIAL-EFFUSION IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION - A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF A CONSECUTIVE SERIES OF PATIENTS EMPLOYING SERIAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY
Je. Madias et al., PERICARDITIS AND PERICARDIAL-EFFUSION IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION - A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF A CONSECUTIVE SERIES OF PATIENTS EMPLOYING SERIAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, American journal of noninvasive cardiology, 8(5), 1994, pp. 270-277
A consecutive series of 174 patients with acute myocardial infarction
(MI) was prospectively monitored for pericardial friction rub to diagn
ose pericarditis (PER) and had three echocardiograms on days 1, 3 and
10 of hospitalization, to detect a pericardial effusion (PE). The rela
tionship of heparin therapy to PER and PE was also studied. Patients w
ith PER (n = 41, 23.6% of total) had a higher rate of anterior MI (65.
9 vs. 36.8%, p < 0.001), heparin therapy (100 vs. 84.2%, p < 0.001) an
d PE (34.1 vs. 15.0%, p < 0.01) than those without PER; also the PE on
day 1 was smaller in the patients with than without PER (0.5 +/- 1.2
vs. 2.3 +/- 2.7 mm, p < 0.005), but not different on days 3 and 10. Pa
tients with PE (n = 34, 19.5% of total) differed from those without PE
only in the incidence of PER (41 vs. 19%, p < 0.01). PE increased bet
ween days 1 and 3 (1.5 +/- 2.3 vs. 3.7 +/- 5.3 mm, p < 0.05), but was
not different between days 3 and 10, during which it was 3.8 +/- 3.3 m
m. No higher rate of complications was noted in connection with PER or
PE, either in the hospital or for a mean of 20 months after discharge
. Heparin therapy in patients with PER and PE did not have an untoward
effect. Hence, PER and PE were frequent in patients with MI; their em
ergence even in patients receiving heparin did not alter the expected
clinical outcome, both in the hospital and during a mean 20-month foll
ow-up after discharge.