Je. Hose et Lj. Guillette, DEFINING THE ROLE OF POLLUTANTS IN THE DISRUPTION OF REPRODUCTION IN WILDLIFE, Environmental health perspectives, 103, 1995, pp. 87-91
Although chemical exposure has been associated with reduced reproducti
on in certain North American fish, reptiles, and mammals, definitive c
ause-and-effect data are lacking in many instances. Because the increa
sing use and global transport of industrial chemicals pose significant
risk to successful reproduction, methods should be developed that can
define the geographic extent and magnitude of injury and risk to wild
life. Because industrial chemicals are articles of commerce, informati
on about injury to wildlife has been contentious and too often ineffec
tive in changing societal behavior. The following strategies are advoc
ated for inferring causal relationships. First, a balanced and compreh
ensive assessment of the data is necessary to determine the geographic
extent of exposure and reproductive effects associated with environme
ntal pollution. Initial efforts to document reproductive injury should
focus on specific ecosystems in which detrimental effects have been o
bserved, but lack sufficient causal data. Model systems (including exp
erimental mesocosms or field ecosystems) should be identified or desig
ned that can adequately test multigenerational reproductive effects. M
echanistic data from supportive laboratory studies on reproductive tox
icity, quantitative structure-activity relationships, and bioaccumulat
ion can be used to predict effects of related pollutants and to determ
ine risk. Such information is essential to prevent future injury to wi
ldlife and to prioritize the numerous remediation decisions facing our
society.