GLOBAL SELF-ESTEEM AND SPECIFIC SELF-ESTEEM - DIFFERENT CONCEPTS, DIFFERENT OUTCOMES

Citation
M. Rosenberg et al., GLOBAL SELF-ESTEEM AND SPECIFIC SELF-ESTEEM - DIFFERENT CONCEPTS, DIFFERENT OUTCOMES, American sociological review, 60(1), 1995, pp. 141-156
Citations number
62
Categorie Soggetti
Sociology
ISSN journal
00031224
Volume
60
Issue
1
Year of publication
1995
Pages
141 - 156
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-1224(1995)60:1<141:GSASS->2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
In this paper, we attempt to shed light on the nature of relevance of, and relationship between global self-esteem and specific self-esteem. We marshal evidence that the two types of self-esteem may have striki ngly different consequences, global self-esteem being more relevant to psychological wellbeing, and specific self-esteem being more relevant to behavior. We use linear structural equation causal modeling to tes t this hypothesis for the case of global self-esteem (Rosenberg 1979) and specific (academic) self-esteem. Our findings show that, while glo bal self-esteem is more strongly related to measures of psychological well-being, specific (academic) self-esteem is a much better predictor of school performance. Other findings indicate that the degree to whi ch specific academic self-esteem affects global self-esteem, particula rly the positive component of global self-esteem, is a function of how highly academic performance is personally valued.