Hi. Kortis et al., USE OF PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA WITH ALFENTANIL FOR EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY, Journal of clinical anesthesia, 7(3), 1995, pp. 205-210
Study Objective: To compare the efficacy of patient-controlled analges
ia (PCA) to physician-controlled analgesia in patients undergoing extr
acorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). Design: Prospective, randomi
zed trial. Setting: New Jersey Kidney Stone Treatment Center at Robert
Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ. Patients: 62 ASA
I, II, and III patients undergoing ESWL. Interventions: The control g
roup (n = 29) received physician-controlled analgesia with continuous
infusions (0.75 mcg/kg/min) and intermittent boluses (5 mcg/kg) of alf
entanil. PCA patients (n = 33) initially received alfentanil 0.5 mcg/k
g followed by a continuous background infusion (0.2 to 0.5 mcg/kg/min)
and self-administered alfentanil (3 to 5 mcg/kg) with a 5-minute lock
out period. Bolus doses and infusion rates were determined by patient
comfort and cardiorespiratory response to alfentanil. Measurements and
Main Results: Prior to the procedure, the patients completed two ques
tionnaires (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and Multidimensional Health
Locus of Control Scales). During ESWL, blood pressure, heart rate, res
piratory rate, oxygen saturation, end-tidal CO2, and pain and sedation
levels were measured at 0, 800, 1,600, 2,400, and 3,000 shock waves.
The total doses of alfentanil administered were calculated. PCA patien
ts received 31% less alfentanil than control group patients (p < 0.000
1). Patients with more preoperative anxiety required larger doses of a
lfentanil (p < 0.05). The pain level was slightly higher in the patien
ts receiving PCA (p > 0.05) but most patients reported either no or on
ly mild pain. Side effects from the therapy, such as nausea and vomiti
ng; were either not present or were mild in both groups, with one pati
ent (3% to 4%) in each group reporting mild nausea. Both patients and
urologists were very satisfied with the pain management in both groups
. Conclusions: PCA is a useful alternative to physician-controlled ana
lgesia during ESWL since it provides equivalent pain control while usi
ng less alfentanil.