Pa. Suder et al., REDUCTION OF TRAUMATIC SECONDARY SHOULDER DISLOCATIONS WITH LIDOCAINE, Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 114(4), 1995, pp. 233-236
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the value of local anaest
hesia versus the commonly used intravenous pethidine/diazepam in the r
eduction of acute secondary shoulder dislocations. Patients with a tra
umatic secondary dislocation of the shoulder were randomized to either
locally injected lidocaine or intravenously injected pethidine/diazep
am. The local method was performed with 20 ml of 1% lidocaine. The pat
ients were observed for any complication during and after the procedur
e, and the methods used were evaluated with a visual analogue scale (V
AS). From November 1991 to September 1993, 62 patients were admitted t
o our departments of whom 52 were included in the study. Average age w
as 47 years (range 18-89 years) with 24 men and 28 women. Twenty-six p
atients were randomized to pethidine/diazepam; 22 had a successful red
uction, and 4 were failures. Twenty-six patients received lidocaine, o
f whom 18 were successful and 8 not. Three patients treated with the-i
ntravenous method suffered respiratory depression, and one required an
antidote. No systemic or local side-effects, no neurovascular damage
and no early or late superficial or deep infection were recorded in th
e lidocaine group. There was no statistical difference between the ave
rage VAS value in the two groups. Lidocaine used to reduce acute secon
dary dislocations of the shoulder is a simple and safe method. It is a
s effective as the standard intravenous method and is well accepted by
patients.