Lc. Vandijk et al., ASSESSMENT OF STENOSES IN THE AORTOILIAC TRACT BY CALCULATION OF A VASCULAR-RESISTANCE CHANGE RATIO BEFORE AND AFTER EXERCISE, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery, 9(4), 1995, pp. 444-447
Objectives: Intraarterial pressure measurement is the most reliable me
thod to assess haemodynamically significant stenoses in the nortoiliac
tract. We have tried to develop a simple and quick, non-invasive meth
od to assess stenoses of this type. Design: Prospective semi-blinded c
linical study. Methods: It was postulated that a haemodynamically sign
ificant aortoiliac tract stenosis would result in a lesser degree of v
ascular resistance decrease after vasodilatation, compared to patients
only suffering from femorodistal stenoses. We approximated vascular r
esistance by: (brachial pressure-ankle pressure)/femoral artery mean D
oppler velocity. By dividing vascular resistance at rest by vascular r
esistance after exercise, we calculated the Resistance Change Ratio (R
CR). Patients and results: In 34 patients (50 legs) with arterial sten
oses, the pressure gradient over the aortoiliac segment was compared t
o the RCR. Legs were divided in three groups: group 1 consisted of 22
legs that showed a pressure gradient > 10 mmHg at rest; group 2 showed
a pressure gradient > 10 mmHg after papaverine; group 3 showed a pres
sure gradient of 10 mmHg or less. The median RCR was: 0.74 (range: 0.2
3-4.04) for group 1, 0.71 (range: 0.36-1.80) for group 2 and 0.93 (ran
ge 0.36-2.06) for group 3. There was no significant difference between
the groups (p = 0.19). Conclusion: The RCR could nor be used to accur
ately detect stenoses in the aortoiliac.