REPEATED EXPOSURE OF RHESUS MACAQUES TO LOW-DOSES OF SIMIAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS (SIV) DID NOT PROTECT THEM AGAINST THE CONSEQUENCES OF AHIGH-DOSE SIV CHALLENGE
U. Dittmer et al., REPEATED EXPOSURE OF RHESUS MACAQUES TO LOW-DOSES OF SIMIAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS (SIV) DID NOT PROTECT THEM AGAINST THE CONSEQUENCES OF AHIGH-DOSE SIV CHALLENGE, Journal of General Virology, 76, 1995, pp. 1307-1315
As part of an in vivo titration study of the macaque simian immunodefi
ciency virus (SIVmac) strain 251/spl, macaques were inoculated intrave
nously with various dilutions of this infectious SIVmac. Seven animals
received dilutions from 10(-3) to 10(-6) of STVmac(251/spl). Two monk
eys infected with the 10(-3) dilution of SIVmac exhibited a productive
infection as indicated by seroconversion, detection of genomic RNA an
d proviral DNA and positive virus isolation. These animals showed a cy
totoxic T cell (CTL) response against different SIVmac proteins withou
t any measurable T cell proliferation. The five macaques receiving hig
her virus dilutions did not seroconvert and were negative for both vir
al RNA and for infectious virus, although proviral DNA was detected in
their peripheral blood mononuclear cells. In contrast to the animals
receiving the 10(-3) virus dilution, these five silently infected monk
eys developed an SIV-specific proliferative T cell response but SIV-sp
ecific CTL could not be observed. The SIV-specific T cell proliferatio
n of the silently infected animals could be boosted by a second low-do
se exposure with a 10(-4) or 10(-5) dilution of SIVmac(251/spl). The v
irological status of the animals was not changed following this second
virus inoculation. Four months later these macaques were challenged i
ntravenously with 2 ml of a 10(-4) dilution of SIVmac(251/32H) contain
ing 10 monkey ID50. After this challenge all SIV-pre-exposed animals a
nd three naive controls became productively infected. In addition, all
infected animals developed typical signs of an immunodeficiency withi
n 6 months after infection. These observations indicate that macaques
infected silently by a low-dose exposure to infectious virus generated
a virus-specific cellular immune response. However, SIV-specific T ce
ll proliferation alone could not protect the monkeys against an intrav
enous challenge with SIVmac and the subsequent development of AIDS-lik
e symptoms.