Aj. Osullivan et Kky. Ho, A COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF ORAL AND TRANSDERMAL ESTROGEN REPLACEMENT ON INSULIN SENSITIVITY IN POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 80(6), 1995, pp. 1783-1788
Previous studies have shown that oral, but not transdermal, administra
tion of estrogen stimulates GH secretion in postmenopausal women. Beca
use GH impairs insulin action, the impact of estrogen replacement ther
apy on carbohydrate metabolism may be influenced by the route of admin
istration. The aim of this study was to prospectively compare the effe
cts of oral and transdermal estrogen replacement on glucose tolerance
and insulin sensitivity in postmenopausal women. In an open label, ran
domized, cross-over study, nine postmenopausal women were randomized t
o transdermal estrogen patches (Estraderm-TTS 100) or oral conjugated
estrogen (Premarin, 1.25 mg) daily for 12 weeks and then crossed over
to receive the alternative treatment for a further 12 weeks. An oral g
lucose tolerance test and hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp (HEC) were
per formed before treatment and at the end of 10 weeks of treatment.
Oral and transdermal estrogen both significantly reduced LH to the sam
e degree. Mean GH did not significantly change with transdermal estrog
en, but rose significantly during oral estrogen therapy. Peak and mean
glucose and insulin levels during the oral glucose tolerance test wer
e not altered by estrogen therapy and were not significantly different
between treatments. Mean glucose and insulin levels were maintained a
t an identical level during the HEC performed at pretreatment and duri
ng estrogen therapy. The mean glucose infusion rate required to mainta
in euglycemia during the HEC (mean +/- SEM, pretreatment, 40.4 +/- 4.8
mu mol/kg . min) was unaltered by oral (39.8 +/- 4.6 mu mol/kg . min)
or transdermal estrogen treatment (42.1 +/- 4.2 mu mol/kg . min). How
ever, during the transdermal estrogen phase (60 +/- 10 mu mol/L), the
mean nonesterified free fatty acid concentration was suppressed to a s
ignificantly lower level during the HEC than during the oral estrogen
phase(120 +/- 20 mu mol/L; P < 0.05). We conclude that compared to the
oral route, transdermal estrogen therapy is associated with a slight,
but significant, improvement of insulin action on lipid metabolism. H
owever, in the short term, the route of estrogen replacement therapy d
oes not have a major impact on glucose metabolism in postmenopausal wo
men.