Kd. Cicerone et K. Kalmar, PERSISTENT POSTCONCUSSION SYNDROME - THE STRUCTURE OF SUBJECTIVE COMPLAINTS AFTER MILD TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY, The journal of head trauma rehabilitation, 10(3), 1995, pp. 1-17
Objective: To examine the structure of persistent postconcussive sympt
oms in a sample of patients with mild traumatic brain injury. Design:
Multivariate discriminant analysis in a series of 50 consecutive clini
cal referrals evaluated for postconcussive symptoms, neuropsychologica
l functioning, and personality and emotional functioning at least 3 mo
nths after injury; follow-up information regarding level of disability
was obtained for 37 patients at least 1 year after injury. Setting: N
europsychology clinic affiliated with a comprehensive brain trauma reh
abilitation center. Patients: 50 consecutively referred patients with
a diagnosis of mild traumatic brain injury referred by physicians, reh
abilitation nurses, or attorneys because of persistent deficits or sub
jective complaints consistent with a postconcussion syndrome. Main Out
come Measure: Postconcussive symptoms endorsed on the Post Mild Trauma
tic Brain Injury Symptom Checklist. Results: Pour factors consisting o
f multiple symptoms were identified: cognitive factor, affective facto
r, somatic factor, and sensory factor. Using these four factors, K-mea
ns cluster analysis of subjects was applied to classify patients. Pati
ent clusters consisted of those with minimal symptoms, those with prim
arily cognitive-affective symptoms, those with prominent somatic sympt
oms, and those with severe global symptoms (P = .000). Patient symptom
clusters were largely unrelated to neurological or neuropsychological
functioning. The presence of chronic disability and resumption of pro
ductive functioning differed significantly among groups (P = .003). Co
nclusions: Subjective complaints provide clinically meaningful informa
tion and are strongly related to the nature and extent of disability a
fter mild traumatic brain injury. Characterization of a single postcon
cussive syndrome may be misleading, and it may be more meaningful to d
efine a number of postconcussive syndromes with differing symptom prof
iles and recovery.