Cs. Chen et al., EPIDIDYMAL SPERM ASPIRATION WITH ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNIQUES - DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CONGENITAL AND ACQUIRED OBSTRUCTIVE AZOOSPERMIA, Human reproduction, 10(5), 1995, pp. 1104-1108
From July 1992 to May 1994, 31 cases of obstructive azoospermia-induce
d infertility underwent 35 epididymal sperm aspiration procedures and
assisted reproductive techniques. These included in-vitro fertilizatio
n zygote intra-Fallopian transfer (ZIFT), subzonal insemination (SUZI)
and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with embryo transfer or t
ubal embryo transfer. The motile spermatozoa were retrieved using a ga
uge 24 Medicut cannula and flush medium. Total oocyte fertilization ra
te was 23.4% and the clinical pregnancy rate was 12.5% (four out of 32
treatment cycles). Congenital absence of the vas deferens was found i
n 16 cases (51.6%) and secondary genital duct obstruction was present
in 15 cases (48.4%). In all, 29 aspirations were retrieved from the ca
put of the epididymis and six from the epididymal beds or tail. The fe
rtilization rate for the caput spermatozoa was much less than that for
other areas of the epididymis (P < 0.05). Though there were no predic
table differences in fertilization rates between the congenital and ac
quired groups, by using epididymal spermatozoa for assisted reproducti
on, the congenital group seemed to have a stronger tendency to achieve
pregnancy (20 versus 5.9%).