Sweden, by many regarded as the archetypal welfare state, has recently
experienced severe problems of weak economic performance, sharply ris
ing unemployment and cutbacks in social policies. In this paper, data
from national surveys over the last decade are analysed in order to as
sess whether recent changes in the political arena point to more long-
term problems of legitimacy for Swedish welfare policies. The purposes
are (a) to track the overall attitudes to various aspects of Swedish
welfare policies in order to assess which, if any, parts and aspects o
f the welfare state have experienced a fall in public support, and (b)
to analyse what changes have taken place in how various structural cl
eavages are linked to attitudes. It has been argued, from a variety of
theoretical perspectives, that the former class-based conflicts aroun
d welfare policies are increasingly diluted, or superseded, by other c
onflicts emanating from gender, sector employment, client status, hous
ing conditions or other possible sources of identity and interests. Th
e results in this paper indicate that such claims are exaggerated, and
that stability, in aggregate responses, attitudinal patterns and soci
al cleavages, characterizes attitudes to Swedish welfare policies.