Hc. Steinert et al., NONSMALL CELL LUNG-CANCER - NODAL STAGING WITH FDG PET VERSUS CT WITHCORRELATIVE LYMPH-NODE MAPPING AND SAMPLING, Radiology, 202(2), 1997, pp. 441-446
PURPOSE: To prospectively compare the accuracy of positron emission to
mography (PET) with 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) with
that of computed tomography (CT) in the nodal staging of non-small ce
ll lung cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PET and contrast material-enhan
ced CT were performed in 47 patients suspected of having or with newly
diagnosed non-small cell lung cancer. Each imaging study was evaluate
d separately, and nodal stations were localized according to the Ameri
can Thoracic Society mapping system. Extensive lymph node sampling (59
9 nodes from 191 nodal stations) of the ipsi- and contralateral trache
obronchial and mediastinal nodal stations was performed at thoracotomy
and/or mediastinoscopy. Imaging findings were correlated with histopa
thologic staging results. RESULTS: The sensitivity of PET and CT was 8
9% and 57%, respectively, for the staging of N2 or N3 disease in media
stinal nodes; specificity was 99% and 94%, respectively; positive pred
ictive value was 96% and 76%, respectively; negative predictive value
was 97% and 87%, respectively; and accuracy was 96% and 85%, respectiv
ely. In assigning the correct N stage, PET was correct in 96% and CT i
n 79% of cases. CONCLUSION: PET with FDG appears to be superior to CT
for nodal staging of non-small cell lung cancer.