PURPOSE: To validate a technique of computer-simulated dose reduction
for conventional chest computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS
: In 27 patients, CT scans were obtained at 200, 100, and 40 mAs at tw
o levels. The raw data from the 200-mAs scan were modified on a comput
er workstation to simulate the increased noise present on 100-and 40-m
As scans. Real and simulated 100- and 40-mAs images were independently
assessed in random order for overall image quality and radiologic fin
dings by four subspecialty-trained chest radiologists who were blinded
to the technique. The four observers were given paired real and simul
ated images. They were asked to identify the real image and note any d
ifference in diagnostic quality. RESULTS: No difference was seen in ov
erall image quality or radiologic findings between real and simulated
images (P > .05). In the paired comparison, 433 of 864 (50.1%) real im
ages were correctly identified. CONCLUSION: Computer modification of 2
00-mAs raw scan data to simulate 100- and 40-mAs noise levels produces
reconstructed images indistinguishable from real 100- and 40-mAs scan
s. This technique provides realistic reduced-dose images without patie
nt radiation exposure and with identical image registration and motion
artifact.