POPULATION-STRUCTURE OF MORPHOLOGICAL TRAITS IN CLARKIA-DUDLEYANA .1.COMPARISON OF F-ST BETWEEN ALLOZYMES AND MORPHOLOGICAL TRAITS

Citation
Rh. Podolsky et Tp. Holtsford, POPULATION-STRUCTURE OF MORPHOLOGICAL TRAITS IN CLARKIA-DUDLEYANA .1.COMPARISON OF F-ST BETWEEN ALLOZYMES AND MORPHOLOGICAL TRAITS, Genetics, 140(2), 1995, pp. 733-744
Citations number
66
Categorie Soggetti
Genetics & Heredity
Journal title
ISSN journal
00166731
Volume
140
Issue
2
Year of publication
1995
Pages
733 - 744
Database
ISI
SICI code
0016-6731(1995)140:2<733:POMTIC>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
Studies of genetic variation at allozyme loci, assumed to be selective ly neutral, have provided valuable insights into the genetic structure of numerous populations. The degree to which population structure of allozyme variation reflects that of quantitative traits, however, is n ot well resolved. Here, we compare estimates of population differentia tion (F-ST) Of 11 populations for allozymes with those for nine discre te and nine continuous morphological traits. Overall, the allozymes ha ve the lowest F-ST estimates, indicating relatively little population differentiation. Excepting two traits, petal width and long internode length, the continuous morphological traits have estimates similar to those from allozymes. The discrete morphological traits tend to have t he highest estimates. On a single trait basis, estimates of F-ST for f our discrete and two continuous traits are higher than those for alloz ymes. A more detailed (narrow-sense quantitative) genetic study of two populations suggests that these estimates of F-ST may underestimate t he true value because of dominance. Clustering analyses show that the pattern of differentiation for the discrete morphological traits stron gly reflects the geographical distribution of the populations, whereas the patterns for the continuous traits and allozymes do not. These re sults suggest that selection has been occurring on the discrete morpho logical traits, selecting to-ward a common optimum within each geograp hic group, and optima differing among geographic groups.