J. Burger et al., IMPORTANCE OF BEACH, MUDFLAT AND MARSH HABITATS TO MIGRANT SHOREBIRDSON DELAWARE BAY, Biological Conservation, 79(2-3), 1997, pp. 283-292
Shorebirds migrate over long distances from breeding to wintering grou
nds, stopping at a few bays and estuaries to refuel. Most information
on migration of shorebirds concentrates on population dynamics and for
aging behavior on intertidal habitats, We studied the behavior of shor
ebirds on mudflats, beaches and marshes on Delaware Bay to understand
how they use different habitats. Dense flocks of shorebirds concentrat
ed on a tidal mudflat, but shorebirds used all the habitats, including
several marshes. The over all percent of shorebirds feeding ranged fr
om 34% (open beach), and 59-63% (tidal and nontidal marshes), to 80% (
tidal mudflat). Variations in the percentage of shorebirds engaged in
feeding, resting and other behaviors depended on location, date, time,
tide and species. A higher percentage of shorebirds fed during the mi
ddle of migration, in early to mid-morning, and during low and rising
tides than at other times. Some shorebirds fed on the marshes and mudf
lats during all tidal states, but none fed on beaches at high tide (be
aches were too narrow). Within each habitat, the highest percentage of
shorebirds engaged in foraging during low tide (marshes) or rising ti
des (mudflats and beaches). Using the percentage of shorebirds engaged
in foraging as an indication of foraging value for each habitat type
within the landscape, we concluded that a mosaic of habitat types rang
ing from mudflats to high marshes is essential to sustain the high pop
ulations of shorebirds that use Delaware Bay during spring migration.
Copyright (C) 1996 Published by Elsevier Science Limited