Magnetic stimulation performed with a double-cone coil placed over app
ropriate positions on the back of the head reduced the size of electro
myographic responses evoked by magnetic cortical stimulation in the fi
rst dorsal interosseous muscle when it preceded the cortical stimulus
by 5, 6, and 7 msec. No suppression of responses to electrical cortica
l stimulation occurred. Greater suppression was evoked by stronger cer
ebellar stimuli; lesser suppression was elicited by stronger: cortical
stimuli. These physiological findings correspond to those obtained wi
th electrical cerebellar stimulation. The most effective position for
magnetic stimulation over the back of the head was slightly rostral to
the foramen magnum level on the ipsilateral side of the muscle studie
d. This indicates that the conditioning stimulus activates certain str
uctures at the back of the head on the ipsilateral side of the muscle,
consistent with the cerebellum, because the part of the cerebellum re
gulating limb muscles is positioned about there on the ipsilateral sid
e. In 2 patients with only cerebellar dysfunction, this suppression ef
fect was not elicited, which also supports that the suppression is cau
sed by activity in cerebellar structures. We conclude that magnetic st
imulation over the cerebellum with a double-cone coil elicits the same
suppressive effect: on the motor cortex as electrical stimulation, bu
t with less discomfort; moreover, we believe that this effect is produ
ced by activation of certain cerebellar structures.