The caudal myology of prehensile-tailed monkeys (Cebus apella, Alouatt
a palliata, Alouatta seniculus, Lagothrix lagotricha, and Ateles panis
cus) and nonprehensile-tailed primates (Eulemur fulvus, Aotus trivirga
tus, Callithrix jacchus, Pithecia pithecia, Saimiri sciureus, Macaca f
ascicularis, and Cercopithecus aethiops) was examined and compared in
order to identify muscular differences that correlate with osteologica
l features diagnostic of tail prehensility. In addition, electrophysio
logical stimulation was carried out on different segments of the inter
transversarii caudae muscle of an adult spider monkey (Ateles geoffroy
i) to assess their action on the prehensile tail. Several important mu
scular differences characterize the prehensile tail of New World monke
ys compared to the nonprehensile tail of other primates. In atelines a
nd Cebus, the mass of extensor caudae lateralis and flexor caudae long
us muscles is more uniform along the tail, and their long tendons cros
s a small number of vertebrae before insertion. Also, prehensile-taile
d monkeys, especially atelines, are characterized by well-developed fl
exor and intertransversarii caudae muscles compared to nonprehensile-t
ailed primates. Finally, Ateles possesses a bulkier abductor caudae me
dialis and a more cranial origin for the first segment of intertransve
rsarii caudae than do other prehensile-tailed platyrrhines. These myol
ogical differences between nonprehensile-tailed and prehensile-tailed
primates, and among prehensile-tailed monkeys, agree with published os
teological and behavioral data. Caudal myological similarities and dif
ferences found in Cebus and atelines, combined with tail-use data from
the literature, support the hypothesis that prehensile tails evolved
in parallel in Cebus and atelines. (C) 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.