Di. Flitcroft et al., WHO SHOULD SEE EYE CASUALTIES - A COMPARISON OF EYE CARE IN AN ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT WITH A DEDICATED EYE CASUALTY, Journal of accident & emergency medicine, 12(1), 1995, pp. 23-27
Citations number
6
Categorie Soggetti
Emergency Medicine & Critical Care","Medicine, General & Internal
Emergency care for eye complaints is provided both by accident and eme
rgency (A&E) departments as well as by dedicated eye casualty departme
nts. This study examines the role of each type of department and the q
uality of eye care provided. Significant differences were found betwee
n the accident and emergency department and the eye casualty departmen
t in the history, examination and management of eye patients. Most not
ably, there were significant differences in the quality of the assessm
ent in the two institutions. Overall 19% (19/100) of A&E records had a
n inadequate history, compared with 2% (1/50) for eye casualty records
. Fifty-nine per cent (59/100) of A&E records contained a significant
examination omission, compared with only 8% (4/50) of eye casualty rec
ords. Most of the omissions related to a failure to perform an adequat
e, yet simple, ocular examination including failure to record visual a
cuity. In 44% (44-100) of A&E cases visual acuity was not recorded or
recorded incorrectly. In comparison acuity omissions in eye casualty w
ere present in only 4% (2/50) of cases.