Bd. Wisenden et Mha. Keenleyside, BROOD SIZE AND THE ECONOMY OF BROOD DEFENSE - EXAMINING LACK HYPOTHESIS IN A BIPARENTAL CICHLID FISH, Environmental biology of fishes, 43(2), 1995, pp. 145-151
We tested the explanatory value of two hypotheses reviewed by Lack (19
54) in the maintenance of brood size in free-ranging convict cichlids
Cichlasoma nigrofasciatum: (1) physiological constraints on egg produc
tion, and (2) behavioural constraints imposed by brood defence. Number
of free-swimming young in 13 experimental (E) broods was augmented to
the upper limit of the size distribution of natural broods (150 young
); 18 control (C) broods were handled in the same way but brood size w
as not changed (mean +/-SE = 69.5 +/- 11.0). E and C brood sizes were
measured at 5 day intervals. At day 20 (just before independence from
parental care), 50.3 +/- 9.4 (n = 9) young remained in E broods and 30
.8 +/- 7.8 (n = 8) young remained in C broods (p > 0.05). Offspring nu
mber did not differ significantly (p > 0.05) between C and E broods af
ter day 10. Mean growth rate of offspring was significantly lower in E
broods than in C broods, perhaps in response to increased density of
young in the former. Both the convergence of offspring number in E and
C broods and suppression of growth in E broods support a behavioural
constraint; that during the first 10 days in which the young are free
swimming, two parents are unable to defend large broods as successfull
y as small broods. A trade-off exists in parental investment between c
urrent and future reproduction. Extra-parental investment in current r
eproduction (eggs) does not result in an increased number of young at
independence, therefore a behavioural constraint during brood defence
should stabilize the evolution of clutch size.