E. Cellier et al., PERIPHERAL EFFECTS OF 3 NOVEL NONPEPTIDE TACHYKININ NK1 RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS IN THE ANESTHETIZED RAT, European journal of pharmacology, 318(2-3), 1996, pp. 377-385
Three novel non-peptide tachykinin NK1 receptor antagonists were asses
sed on the transient fall in mean arterial blood pressure and the sali
vation induced by i.v. substance P (0.65 nmol/kg) in the urethane-anae
thetized rat. LY303241 ((R)-1-[N-(2- methoxybenzyl)acetylamino]-3-(1H-
indol-3-yl)-2-[ (2-(4-(phenylpiperazin-1-yl)acetyl)amino]propane), LY3
03870 -1-methoxybenzyl)acetylamino]-3-(1H-indol-3-yl)-2- iperidin-1-yl
)piperidin-1-yl)acetyl)amino]propane) and LY306740 ((R)-1-[N-(2-methox
ybenzyl)acetylamino]-3-(1 )-2-[N-(2-(4-cyclohexylpipeazin-1-yl)acetyl)
amino] propane (65 nmol-9 mu mol/kg i.v.; 5 min earlier) inhibited bot
h the vasodepressor and salivary responses to substance P in a dose-de
pendent manner. LY303241 and LY306740 were more potent in inhibiting t
he vascular response to substance P while LY303870 was more potent in
inhibiting the salivary response. LY303870 and LY306740 were devoid of
direct effects while LY303241 decreased blood pressure and heart rate
for 1 and 10 min, respectively. The antagonists act in a stereoselect
ive and specific manner since the opposite (S) enantiomers of LY303870
(LY306155) and LY306740 (LY307679) failed to block the effects of sub
stance P. In addition, LY303241, LY303870 and LY306740 neither affecte
d the hypotension and the salivation induced by carbachol nor the incr
eases in mean arterial pressure and heart rate induced by the tachykin
in NK2 receptor agonist [beta-Ala(8)] neurokinin A-(4-10). Only LY3032
41 attenuated the decreases in mean arterial pressure and heart rate e
voked by the tachykinin NK3 receptor agonist senktide. LY303870 and LY
306740 appear to be the most interesting antagonists since they act in
a specific and selective manner at the tachykinin NK1 receptor. The d
ifference in the order of potency of the three antagonists to inhibit
the hypotension and salivation elicited by substance P could be ascrib
ed to their pharmacodynamic features or to the existence of different
signal transduction mechanisms or receptor subtypes.