NITRATE REGULATION OF NITRATE UPTAKE AND NITRATE REDUCTASE EXPRESSIONIN BARLEY GROWN AT DIFFERENT NITRATE AMMONIUM RATIOS AT CONSTANT RELATIVE NITROGEN ADDITION RATE/
Me. Samuelson et al., NITRATE REGULATION OF NITRATE UPTAKE AND NITRATE REDUCTASE EXPRESSIONIN BARLEY GROWN AT DIFFERENT NITRATE AMMONIUM RATIOS AT CONSTANT RELATIVE NITROGEN ADDITION RATE/, Physiologia Plantarum, 94(2), 1995, pp. 254-260
Barley (Hordeum vulgare L. cv. Golf) was cultured using the relative a
ddition rate technique, where nitrogen is added in a fixed relation to
the nitrogen already bound in biomass. The relative rate of total nit
rogen addition was 0.09 day(-1) (growth limiting by 35%), while the ni
trate addition was varied by means of different nitrate: ammonium rati
os. In 3- to 4-week-old plants, these ratios of nitrate to ammonium su
pported nitrate fluxes ranging from 0 to 22 mu mol g(-1) root dry weig
ht h(-1), whereas the total N flux was 21.8 +/- 0.25 mu mol g(-1) root
dry weight h(-1) for all treatments. The external nitrate concentrati
ons Varied between 0.18 and 1.5 mu M. The relative growth rate, root t
o total biomass dry weight ratios, as well as Kjeldahl nitrogen in roo
ts and shoots were unaffected by the nitrate:ammonium ratio. Tissue ni
trate concentration in roots were comparable in all treatments. Shoot
nitrate concentration increased with increasing nitrate supply, indica
ting increased translocation of nitrate to the shoot. The apparent V-m
ax for net nitrate uptake increased with increased nitrate fluxes. Upt
ake activity was recorded also after growth at zero nitrate addition.
This activity may have been induced by the small, but detectable, nitr
ate concentration in the medium under these conditions. In contrast, n
itrate reductase (NR) activity in roots was unaffected by different ni
trate fluxes, whereas NR activity in the shoot increased with increase
d nitrate supply. NR-mRNA was detected in roots from all cultures and
showed no significant response to the nitrate flux, corroborating the
data for NR activity. The data show that an extremely low amount of ni
trate is required to elicit expression of NR and uptake activity. Howe
ver, the uptake system and root NR respond differentially to increased
nitrate flux at constant total N nutrition. It appears that root NR e
xpression under these conditions is additionally controlled by factors
related to the total N flux or the internal N status of the root and/
or plant. The method used in this study may facilitate separation of n
itrate-specific responses from the nutritional effect of nitrate.