Nb. Guttman et Cb. Baker, EXPLORATORY ANALYSIS OF THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TEMPERATURE OBSERVATIONS RECORDED BY ASOS AND CONVENTIONAL METHODS, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 77(12), 1996, pp. 2865-2873
The Automated Surface Observing System is currently replacing conventi
onal observations at the National Weather Service, the Federal Aviatio
n Administration, and other stations that report hourly observations.
From a climatological viewpoint, it is necessary to compare the data f
rom the old and new measuring systems in order to gain an understandin
g of their differences. These differences may become important when us
ing time series for applications such as the computation of climatic n
ormals, the development of homogeneous datasets for long periods of re
cord for the investigation of climatic change, the placing of events i
nto historical perspective, or the analysis of extreme weather events.
This exploratory study of temperature data was undertaken to determin
e first whether there is a data continuity problem between the two obs
erving systems and second, if there is a problem, to identify the magn
itude of the problem. The most important conclusion from this study is
that differences in site characteristics, even at the same airport, p
lay as much, if not more, of a role in assessing the comparability of
measurements from the two observing systems as does the instrument sys
tem bias. The instrument bias at most stations is on the order of a fe
w tenths of a degree Fahrenheit, but the siting differences can lead t
o biases on the order of a couple of degrees. Not only is there a diff
erence in the magnitude of the biases, but there is also a difference
in the direction; the instrument bias is usually negative, but the sit
ing biases can be either positive or negative.