QUANTIFICATION OF RELATIVE AREA OF PS2 IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL STAINING AND EPITHELIAL PERCENTAGE IN BREAST CARCINOMAS - THE EFFECT OF THE LATTER ON THE INTERPRETATION OF A CYTOSOLIC PS2 ASSAY

Citation
F. Willemse et al., QUANTIFICATION OF RELATIVE AREA OF PS2 IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL STAINING AND EPITHELIAL PERCENTAGE IN BREAST CARCINOMAS - THE EFFECT OF THE LATTER ON THE INTERPRETATION OF A CYTOSOLIC PS2 ASSAY, Modern pathology, 8(5), 1995, pp. 521-525
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Pathology
Journal title
ISSN journal
08933952
Volume
8
Issue
5
Year of publication
1995
Pages
521 - 525
Database
ISI
SICI code
0893-3952(1995)8:5<521:QORAOP>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
In immunochemical assays of specific cell constituents in cytosols fro m tumors, the relationship between epithelial and stromal fractions is not taken into account. This may influence the outcome of the measure ments and result in incorrect categorization as negative or positive. In a setting addressing pS2 (only detectable in epithelial cells) in b reast carcinomas, we investigated three possibilities that may overcom e this problem using histologic sections of breast carcinomas of 50 pa tients: (a) visual estimation of area percentage of immunohistochemica l staining of the cell constituent of interest performed by three inde pendent individuals, (b) quantification of area percentage of the immu nohistochemical results by true color image analysis, and (c) quantifi cation of the epithelial and stromal compartments of the tumors in Hei denhain's-azan-stained tissue sections, using the true color image ana lysis system, to assess the epithelial percentage in the tumors. This percentage was used as a correction factor for data on pS2 obtained by cytosolic determinations. Visual estimation appeared to be subject to interobserver variation and, subsequently, becomes less applicable in the absence of strict scoring rules. Based on tests for correlation, image analysis system quantification seemed reproducible in both quant ification procedures. However, due to the high magnification necessary to visualize the immunohistochemical staining product, the effect of field selection caused systematic differences between repeat measureme nts (Friedman test). As a result of the contrasting colors of the azan staining, the calculation of the epithelial percentage could be perfo rmed at a low magnification. Consequently, here the effect of field se lection was not present. Correction of cytosolic values for epithelial percentage resulted in 8% of the cases changing category. In conclusi on, the combined results of the two disciplines (histology and biochem istry) may provide more information than either of them alone.