COMPARISON OF 4 PROLIFERATION MARKERS AND THEIR SIGNIFICANCE FOR EVALUATION OF TUMOR DIGNITY IN INTRACRANIAL TUMORS

Citation
C. Hagel et al., COMPARISON OF 4 PROLIFERATION MARKERS AND THEIR SIGNIFICANCE FOR EVALUATION OF TUMOR DIGNITY IN INTRACRANIAL TUMORS, International journal of oncology, 7(1), 1995, pp. 107-113
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology
ISSN journal
10196439
Volume
7
Issue
1
Year of publication
1995
Pages
107 - 113
Database
ISI
SICI code
1019-6439(1995)7:1<107:CO4PMA>2.0.ZU;2-P
Abstract
The proliferation indices of immunohistochemically detected bromodeoxy uridine, Ki-67 antigen (antibodies Ki-67 and MIB 1), and proliferating cell nuclear antigen were determined manually and with computer assis ted morphometry in 38 gliomas, 29 meningeomas, 9 metastases, and 16 ot her tumors. Comparing the markers among one another the highest correl ation coefficient was found for bromodeoxyuridine and MIB 1 (0.9). The proliferation indices of all markers correlated significantly with th e tumor grading. The highest correlation coefficient for proliferation index and grading (0.7) was calculated for the MIB 1 index determined in one high power field (0.0153 mm(2)) in the tissue area with the hi ghest proliferative activity. Concerning applicability and correlation with tumor dignity MIB 1 was superior to the other three antibodies i nvestigated.