THE COMBINED USE OF THE DECISION TREE TECHNIQUE AND THE COMPUTER-ASSISTED MICROSCOPE ANALYSIS OF FEULGEN-STAINED NUCLEI AS AN AID FOR ASTROCYTIC TUMOR AGGRESSIVENESS CHARACTERIZATION
C. Decaestecker et al., THE COMBINED USE OF THE DECISION TREE TECHNIQUE AND THE COMPUTER-ASSISTED MICROSCOPE ANALYSIS OF FEULGEN-STAINED NUCLEI AS AN AID FOR ASTROCYTIC TUMOR AGGRESSIVENESS CHARACTERIZATION, International journal of oncology, 7(1), 1995, pp. 183-189
A systematic and thus objective method is proposed to characterize ast
rocytic tumor aggressiveness. This method relies upon the combined use
of a specific decisional algorithm (the decision tree) and 23 paramet
ers which include 15 morphonuclear parameters describing the geometric
, densitometric, and textural features of a cell nucleus, and 8 parame
ters describing the various levels of nuclear DNA content. These 23 pa
rameters were objectively quantified by means of the digital cell imag
e analysis of Feulgen-stained nuclei. This methodology was used to inv
estigate whether it could be applied as a diagnostic tool. The biologi
cal model chosen included 12 cell lines adapted to grow in vitro and s
temming from 4 astrocytomas (weakly malignant astrocytic tumors) and 6
glioblastomas (highly malignant ones). The 2 additional cell lines we
re from two medulloblastomas (MED) (2 highly malignant primitive neuro
-ectodermal tumors). The results demonstrate unambiguously that it is
actually possible to distinguish between low-grade and high-grade tumo
rs on the basis of these parameters, which describe their morphonuclea
r features and the amount of their nuclear content. However, a clear-c
ut distinction between these different types of tumors can only be att
ained when a specific technique is used. In the present case this was
the decision tree technique. We were not able to distinguish between t
hese various histopathological groups when we used conventional statis
tical methods including the one-way-variance analysis of data or the c
arrying out of the X(2) test.