DISPOSABLE, SHEATHED, FLEXIBLE SIGMOIDOSCOPY - A PROSPECTIVE, MULTICENTER, RANDOMIZED TRIAL

Citation
Ri. Rothstein et B. Littenberg, DISPOSABLE, SHEATHED, FLEXIBLE SIGMOIDOSCOPY - A PROSPECTIVE, MULTICENTER, RANDOMIZED TRIAL, Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 41(6), 1995, pp. 566-572
Citations number
35
Categorie Soggetti
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00165107
Volume
41
Issue
6
Year of publication
1995
Pages
566 - 572
Database
ISI
SICI code
0016-5107(1995)41:6<566:DSFS-A>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
A new fiberoptic sigmoidoscopic system has been developed that utilize s a disposable sheath to cover and protect all working surfaces of the endoscope from contamination. The reusable part of the endoscope has no air, water, or suction/biopsy channels. These are incorporated in t he disposable sheath, which is easily removed after use to provide eac h patient with a contamination-free endoscope. A prospective, randomiz ed, controlled trial was performed to compare the disposable, sheathed , flexible sigmoidoscope with standard sigmoidoscopes. Clinical evalua tions of the new sigmoidoscope system were performed at 15 facilities. Visual analog rating scales were used to record evaluations of endosc ope performance and reprocessing by endoscopists and reprocessing pers onnel. The time to perform procedures, depth of insertion, and total i nstrument downtime were also recorded. One hundred forty-three procedu res (70 standard, 73 sheathed) were performed. No significant differen ce was found for overall depth of insertion (50 versus 48 cm), althoug h fewer sheathed endoscopes reached to 60 cm than did standard endosco pes (51% versus 30%). The sheathed system had a slightly longer mean p rocedure time than the standard (5.6 versus 6.7 minutes), but a signif icantly shortened overall downtime (32.8 vs 8.1 minutes). The standard system was preferred by the endoscopists. Reprocessing personnel pref erred the disposable system. The disposable sigmoidoscope system has i mportant advantages of decreased instrument turn-around time and poten tially increased staff and patient safety, and future models should be improved to meet physicians' concerns.