Using a crossed-response task, monkeys with neglect induced by frontal
lesions appear to have motor rather than sensory neglect. However, th
e crossed-response task may not reveal sensory neglect (inattention) i
f no perceptual discrimination is required. We therefore trained two m
onkeys in a perceptually complex crossed-response task. Following unil
ateral frontal (arcuate gyrus) ablation, we found no contralateral per
ceptual disorders or sensory neglect in either monkey but did find a f
ailure to respond with the contralateral arm (motor neglect) in both m
onkeys. We also found that the monkeys made more incorrect responses w
ith the arm ipsilateral to the lesion than they did with the contralat
eral arm. The errors made by the ipsilateral arm could be a compensato
ry strategy or a disinhibition phenomenon. Because these incorrect res
ponses were not rewarded and became more frequent as motor neglect imp
roved, the incorrect responses of the ipsilateral arm are not a compen
satory strategy, but rather a defect we term ''disinhibition hyperkine
sia'' or ''allokinesia.''