Me. Gher et Ac. Richardson, THE ACCURACY OF DENTAL RADIOGRAPHIC TECHNIQUES USED FOR EVALUATION OFIMPLANT FIXTURE PLACEMENT, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry, 15(3), 1995, pp. 269-283
Periapical, panoramic, linear tomographic, and computerized tomographi
c radiographs were made of a partially dentate human mandible with fou
r implants in place. Measurements taken from the radiographs and compu
ter-generated images were compared to measurements made directly on th
e cross-sectioned test specimen. Periapical radiographs produced the m
ost accurate measurements. Computerized and linear tomographic images
provided the unique advantage of cross-sectional views of anatomic str
uctures, but image blurring inherent to linear tomography and volume-a
veraging error inherent to computerized tomography affected the accura
cy of measurements made from these images. The use of a dense dimensio
nal reference object helped to compensate for radiographic distortion
and is appropriate when projection radiographic techniques are used. T
he CT reference scale provided the most accurate method for interpreti
ng measurements made from the computerized tomogram. The use of a dens
e dimensional reference object is inappropriate with CT because of ifs
volume-averaging error.