CHARACTERIZATION OF AEROSOLS PRODUCED BY PNEUMATIC NEBULIZERS FOR INDUCTIVELY-COUPLED PLASMA SAMPLE INTRODUCTION - EFFECT OF LIQUID AND GASPOW RATES ON VOLUME BASED DROP SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS
Jw. Olesik et Lc. Bates, CHARACTERIZATION OF AEROSOLS PRODUCED BY PNEUMATIC NEBULIZERS FOR INDUCTIVELY-COUPLED PLASMA SAMPLE INTRODUCTION - EFFECT OF LIQUID AND GASPOW RATES ON VOLUME BASED DROP SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS, Spectrochimica acta, Part B: Atomic spectroscopy, 50(4-7), 1995, pp. 285-303
The effect of liquid sample uptake rate and nebulizer gas flow rate on
analyte transport rates and volume based primary and tertiary drop si
ze distributions were studied for two pneumatic, concentric nebulizers
with a Scott type spray chamber. Experimentally measured Sauter mean
diameters and spans were compared to those predicted by an empirical m
odel. One of the two nebulizers produced analyte transport rates that
were a factor of two or more higher than the other nebulizer under all
uptake rate and gas flow rates studied, despite that the nebulizers w
ere of the same model. When the sample uptake rate is increased 400% (
from 0.4 to 2.0 ml/min) the aerosol transport rate increased by only 6
0 to 68%. Losses of aerosol of ah drop sizes due to secondary and tert
iary processes result in a decrease in the sample transport efficiency
as the uptake rate is increased. When the nebulizer gas flow rate was
increased from 0.4 to 1.0 l/min the analyte transport rate increased
more than a factor of five. The increase in analyte transport rate (an
d efficiency) as the gas flow rate was increased from 0.4 to 0.6 or 0.
7 l/min was due to both a larger volume of small primary aerosol drops
produced and less severe losses of drops due to secondary and tertiar
y processes. The relative increase in volume of small primary aerosol
drops produced when the nebulizer gas was increased from 0.6 or 0.7 to
1.0 l/min was similar to the relative increase in analyte transport r
ate. The higher transport rates produced by one of the two nebulizers
was due to a higher production/loss ratio due to secondary and tertiar
y processes for drops of all sizes less than 20 mu m in diameter rathe
r than differences in the volume of primary aerosol contained in small
drops.