Jj. Frost et L. Kaeser, ADOLESCENT USE OF NORPLANT IMPLANTS - CLINIC SERVICES, POLICIES AND BARRIERS TO USE, Journal of adolescent health, 16(5), 1995, pp. 367-372
Introduction: The purpose of this article is to review the experiences
of family planning clinic providers in making Norplant available to a
dolescents. We look specifically at the proportions of women receiving
the implant from these providers who are teenagers, the policies adop
ted regarding implant education and whether or not parental consent is
required for minors. Pricing policies and the implications of high me
thod cost for teenagers are discussed. Finally, some of the policies a
dopted by state agencies related to adolescent use of the implant are
reviewed. Methods: The data come from two national surveys conducted b
y the Alan Guttmacher Institute (AGI). The first, a survey of family p
lanning agencies, collected data from 616 family planning providers of
clinic services (response rate 69%). The second surveyed the Medicaid
, health and welfare agencies in all 51 jurisdictions about policies r
elated to Norplant. Results: Over one-quarter of all contraceptive imp
lants inserted by family planning agencies were provided to teenagers.
Teenagers were routinely informed about the implant in about 85% of t
hose clinics offering implant services. Few state agencies notify wome
n about the implant. Twenty-three percent of all family planning agenc
ies providing implant services report that parental consent must be ob
tained prior to implant insertion. The Medicaid program has paid for a
majority of implant insertions at family planning agencies. Conclusio
ns: Teenagers who rely on publicly funded family planning clinics for
contraceptive services face a variety of barriers in obtaining Norplan
t. High method cost, parental consent requirements and issues related
to Medicaid eligibility are likely to deter some teenagers who might o
therwise choose Norplant.