Lottery-rationed permit systems are used to allocate hunting opportuni
ties where demand for permits exceeds the ability of the animal popula
tions to sustain hunting harvest levels. Attempts to estimate the valu
es of lottery-rationed hunting use a zonal travel cost model where app
lications per capita formed the dependent variable and expected travel
costs represent the price variable. This paper reexamines this analys
is using a discrete choice travel cost model which incorporates the ex
pectation of receiving a permit. This model is developed for lottery-r
ationed antelope hunting in Alberta. Choice in the lottery-rationed hu
nting context involves selecting one site from a set defined through m
anagement regulations. The discrete choice travel cost model is propos
ed as superior to the early models because it better represents this b
ehavioral process.