Tn. Chase et al., DOPAMINE-RECEPTOR SUBTYPE-SELECTIVE AGONISTS IN THE TREATMENT OF PARKINSONS-DISEASE, Clinical neuropharmacology, 18, 1995, pp. 207-215
Dopamine agonists have a number of potential advantages over levodopa
in the symptomatic treatment of Parkinson's disease. To evaluate wheth
er the relative affinity of an agonist for the D-1, D-2, and D-3 subty
pes of dopamine receptors influences its antiparkinsonian or dyskinesi
ogenic effect, results with levodopa were compared with those of three
dopamine agonists having differing binding profiles. The antiparkinso
nian response to apomorphine tended to be slightly but not significant
ly lower than with levodopa, whereas the response to both N-propyl-nor
apomorphine (NPA) and N-0923 averaged approximately 33% lower than tha
t for levodopa. The severity of choreiform dyskinesias induced by the
latter two agonists also tended to be somewhat less than those associa
ted with levodopa. The ratio of dyskinesias to antiparkinsonian effica
cy for levodopa and all the agonists evaluated were thus very similar.
Evaluation of the clinical results for these dopaminomimetics with re
spect to their dopamine receptor affinity profile suggests that compar
able binding affinities for the D-1 and D-2 receptors may be associate
d with greater antiparkinsonian activity, which tends to diminish as r
elative D-2 selectivity is enhanced. A relatively high affinity for D-
2 or D-3 receptors appears to be associated with a diminished antipark
insonian response, which in both cases is associated with a somewhat r
educed tendency to induce dyskinesias. A relative affinity for the D-1
receptor appears to have little effect on either antiparkinsonian act
ivity or the potential for dyskinesias. It is conceivable that D-1/D-2
/D-3-nonselective agonists that approximate the receptor affinity prof
ile of dopamine might prove most advantageous in patients with parkins
onism.