Risk assessment has become a popular tool to help solve ecological pro
blems. The basic concept is not new and has been applied to diverse de
cision problems. The application to ecological problems, especially co
mplex ecological problems, is fairly recent and controversial. The fun
damental and most important elements of the controversy revolve around
two key points: (1) a person's implicit ''worldview;'' and (2) the as
sumption of who (or what) receives the benefits and who (or what) pays
the costs for ecological ''decisions.'' A person's attitude toward ri
sk assessment is, at least implicitly, defined by a worldview. It is t
he worldview which defines how each of us react to risk assessment app
lied to ecological problems. How the question of benefits and costs is
defined also defines the appropriate use, if any, of ecological risk
assessment. The future of ecological risk assessment will almost certa
inly follow the course of other analytical tools-enthusiastic support,
rapid, widespread adoption and use, then disillusionment and rapid re
placement with newer approaches, hut with continued use for a greatly
constrained set of ecological issues.