A prospective MRI study of 39 whiplash patients was performed and the
results were compared with the clinical findings. The inclusion criter
ia were: (1) automobile accident, (2) noncontact cervical spine trauma
, (3) no skull injury, (4) conscious patients, (5) no previously known
cervical pain before the accident, (6) plain X-ray of the cervical sp
ine without fracture and (7) MRI within 15 days after trauma. All MR i
mages were obtained blinded with no previous knowledge of the patient'
s symptoms or findings. The MRI parameters included disc bulging eithe
r with impingement on the anterior epidural space or with medullary co
mpression, foraminal stenosis, dorsal ligament thickening, osteophyte
extension and intramedullary or paravertebral soft tissue injury. All
changes were graded visually on a four-point scale (no, some, moderate
or extensive changes). After the MRI evaluation was made the clinical
findings were analysed by two orthopaedic surgeons using a specially
designed protocol. With MRI 29 patients (74%) showed no or only slight
changes, and were thus regarded as normal variations. Of these, 10 to
29 patients (34%) had as the only symptom pain in the head or in the
neck, 19 of 29 patients (66%) showed nuerological changes, either pare
sthesias, sensory deficits or weakness of upper extremities. In 10 (26
%) patients with moderate or extensive MRI changes, 3 of 10 (33%) had
only head or neck pain, or both, and 7 of 10 (66%) had neurological ch
anges. Use of MRI in whiplash injury is helpful, but it is not the fir
st-choice radiological examination method. Despite neurological change
s, the frequency of true traumatic lesions is low. There is no clear c
orrelation between the patients' subjective symptoms or clinical signs
and the findings with MRI. However, MRI can be used to find patients
with disk herniation that can be treated surgically.